A Call to Action: United States Food Loss & Waste 2030 Reduction Goal
The federal government, led by EPA and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), is seeking to work with communities, organizations and businesses along with our partners in state, Tribal and local government to reduce food loss and waste by 50 percent over the next 15 years. As an important stride in reaching the 2030 food reduction goal, EPA hosted the Food Recovery Summit where organizations across the food chain, from manufacturers to consumers, met to discuss the key challenges in reducing food loss and waste. Based on this summit and continued input, EPA, USDA and stakeholders from across the food chain have developed a collaborative Call to Action, which identifies current opportunities and challenges in reducing food loss and waste in the United States.
On this page:
- Objectives
- Key Activities Identified by Stakeholders
- Opportunities and Actions Identified by Stakeholders
Objectives
The purposes of this Call to Action are to:
- collect and synthesis key opportunities and issues identified at the 2015 Food Recovery Summit and subsequent meetings,
- establish a cohesive list of actions available to businesses, organizations, governments, and general public to reduce food loss and waste, and
- inspire new innovations and actions from the stakeholder community to further progress towards the 2030 food loss and waste reduction goal.
EPA and USDA offer this Call to Action in order to highlight and share the assessments of outside experts and representatives of the food system about current opportunities and challenges. As stakeholders across the food supply chain voluntarily initiate actions to reduce food loss and waste, this Call to Action can help them identify opportunities and gaps. EPA and USDA are very interested in learning more about new actions and accomplishments that reflect the nation’s achievements, opportunities and ongoing challenges to reduce food loss and waste.
Stakeholders will determine their own actions or any other input and will not be limited by the content of this Call to Action. EPA’s and USDA’s role is to act as a convener, help facilitate discussion, provide leadership, and compile actions and conversations of individual companies, organizations and stakeholders. The federal government is not seeking consensus advice or recommendations from stakeholders through this Call to Action.
Key Activities Identified by Stakeholders
Participants at the 2015 Food Recovery Summit identified the following key activities as the core of a successful strategy that would result in wide-scale and sustained reductions in food loss and waste.
- Seek Prevention Strategies and Use the Food Recovery Hierarchy: By focusing interventions on the prevention of wasted food and following the principles outlined in the Food Recovery Hierarchy, businesses, individuals and organizations can maximize economic gains while increasing social and environmental benefits
- Increase Public Awareness: Increase consumer and industry awareness of the scale of the food waste problem along with the environmental, social, and economic benefits of reducing wasted food. Furthering food stewardship, donation and waste reduction begins with education and outreach about the collective effects of food waste and providing replicable best practices.
- Improve the Data: Encourage companies and organizations in the private and public sectors to measure their contribution to food loss and waste and their associated reduction efforts. By collecting valid data, businesses can justify sustainable food management investments, tailor their reduction programs, and gain new insights on opportunities to prevent and reduce food loss and waste.
- Forge New Partnerships and Expand the Existing Ones: Leverage existing or create new partnerships to divert excess food to new and/or secondary markets and/or recover food waste that has historically been destined for disposal. When organizations collaborate they are able to share existing infrastructures, resources and expertise, which could help them efficiently restructure food management towards a more sustainable operation.
- Clarify Date Labels and Food Safety: Use clear terminology and phrasing to help consumers and secondary users make better decisions about discarding food. Date labeling, when clearly communicated, can be an effective tool to provide consumers with recommendations from a food manufacturer/producer about the viability or quality of a particular item. However, too often, date labels are ambiguous on what characteristic they are speaking to (e.g., quality or safety), leading consumers, food banks, and others to make an independent assessment on the viability of a product. Understandably, decisions are often made on the conservative side and items are discarded.
- Build Food Loss and Waste Infrastructures: Effectively divert excess food to new markets and recover wasted food by creating new options and incentives to individuals and companies. Increase investments to establish or expand new recovery and/or diversion operations and promote development of new technologies and innovation for food waste recovery. By supporting transportation and processing of excess food, communities can capitalize on the economic opportunities of a sustainable food management system while reducing the cost and environmental burdens associated with landfilling food waste.
Opportunities and Actions Identified by Stakeholders
Stakeholders across the supply chain, including participants at the 2015 Food Recovery Summit, have identified specific opportunities and actions across the food system to reduce FLW. This section divides the food system into focus areas (Production, Manufacturing, Retail/Food Service, Consumers and Donation, Recovery/Recycling, and Regulators/Policy Makers) and identifies opportunities and actions within each area.
In the tables below, opportunities are areas of action with high prospects for reducing food loss and waste. If these opportunities are realized through action, progress will be made in achieving the 2030 FLW reduction goal.
- Key Stakeholders are those stakeholders that are particularly, though not exclusively, associated with a specific area of the food system.
- Demonstrated Practices are ongoing or past interventions identified that have had success in reducing food waste.
- Actions towards progress are suggestions from stakeholders, primarily from the Food Recovery Summit, and are incorporated into this document for reaction and additional comments.
Disclaimer of Endorsement: Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. The examples included in the following sections are for informational purposes only. |
---|
Production
Key Stakeholders
- Farmers
- Ranchers
- Aquaculture
- Plantations/Greenhouses
- Community Gardens
- Transporters
- Retail (grocers, restaurants, vendors, etc.)
Opportunities Highlighted by Stakeholders
Feed people with wholesome, excess food and recovering/recycling inedible portions.
- For crops that are not harvested, due to cost or other constraints, but are wholesome for human or animal consumption, explore partnerships and opportunities with secondary markets, feed operations, or non-profit/volunteer groups to reduce or eliminate cost, transport, and/or labor barriers.
- For produce that is harvested/collected and safe to eat, but may not be marketable due to visual or size defects, develop strategies and infrastructure for utilization.
- For produce, byproducts, and other food materials that are inedible or unsafe for human or animal consumption and on-site composting is unavailable, assess the potential to partner with commercial composters or anaerobic digesters.
- For livestock and aquaculture operations, establish relationships with local growers as well as food manufacturers (e.g., breweries) and retailers (e.g., grocers, restaurants, vendors, cafeterias, food banks) to use wasted food, as allowed under federal and state law, as a feed stock.
- For produce and meat products, work with downstream users (retailers, manufacturers, consumers/food banks) to determine if slight changes in processing or packaging can help increase utilization of a food product or lengthen its viability.
Demonstrated Practices
The following links exit the site
Demonstrated Practices in Production |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders in Production |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
Key Stakeholders
- Food Manufacturers
- Food Processors
- Transporters
Opportunities Highlighted by Stakeholders
Decrease the amount of food waste due to known ambiguity in date labeling and assess current processes to determine areas for increased efficiency and recovery.
- For manufacturing processes, refine standard procedures to avoid loss and seek to replicate efficiency practices. Create a new mindset to treat excess and off-spec food as a resource.
- For final products, ensure clear labeling and packaging for preservation and longevity. Establish a “quality trumps quantity” ethos.
- For unavoidable excess or off-spec products, establish donation networks for feeding people and animals.
- For transportation and storage issues, seek out local options for excess food products (donation centers) and build supply chains, including local chains that optimize storage and reduce waste at every stage of the chain.
- For outreach programs aimed at consumers, provide clear messaging around date labeling and leverage technology and communication platforms to enhance consumer knowledge about food preservation and safety.
Demonstrated Practices
The following links exit the site
In processing: | In unavoidable excess or off spec products: | In outreach |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders
In products: | In unavoidable excess or off-spec products: | In outreach: | Miscellaneous: |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Retail/Food Services
Key Stakeholders
- Grocers
- Vendors
- Restaurants
- Cafeterias
- Food Pantries/Food Banks
- Transporters
Opportunities Highlighted by Stakeholders
Employ programs that build awareness to increase food donations and recovery, better track food inputs and outputs to optimize waste prevention and create efficient management practices, such as the following:
- Capture excess food through expanded networks at the local and/or regional level (e.g., new local partners).
- Improve donation practices by establishing clear guidelines and/or policies for employees.
- Better track the scope and size of food waste generation by creating standard procedures for measurement.
- Reduce operating costs associated with food waste by employing efficiency standards and performance standards to improve inventory and cold supply chain management.
- Increase program viability by engaging customers through outreach and marketing campaigns.
Demonstrated Practices
The following links exit the site
Holistic | Source Reduction | Excess Food to People | Feed to Animals | Digestion and Composting of Scraps |
---|---|---|---|---|
Smart purchasing, staff training and other prep waste reduction controls. | Establish and institutionalize donation protocols. Refer to Starbucks example. | Work with local farms to sell or donate scraps/byproducts to animals. | Commercial/Institutional Collection Partnerships. | |
The World Resources Institute (WRI) and a large group of stakeholders has developed and will release an accounting and reporting standard for quantifying food and associated inedible parts removed from the food supply chain on June 6, 2016. |
Trayless dining, taste tests, portion size reduction and other incentives for plate waste reduction. Refer to: University of Maine at Farmington example |
Utilize Peer-to-Peer matching software that links potential donors with food banks. Refer to: MEANS Database example |
||
Waste audits/measurement and tracking. Refer to EPA’s Reducing Wasted Food & Packaging Toolkit. |
Offer haul-out service to catering or other off site service clients. |
Retain food recovery service to ensure donation of excess catered and other food. Refer to: Convention example | ||
Require sustainable food management and closed loop systems in dining service requests for proposals. Refer to: various universities and dining service providers | Utilize legal and policy tools to maximize food donations. Refer to: Massachusetts' RecyclingWorks Comprehensive Donation Guidelines and Harvard's Food Law and Policy Clinic Fact Sheets | |||
Comprehensive Guidance for Food Recovery Programs from Conference for Food Protection | ||||
Sports venues and concessionaires across the country are moving toward environmentally preferable food service to help build a healthier and more sustainable food program. Find resources on the Green Sports Alliance website. |
To learn more about new tax incentives for businesses that donate food (as of Dec. 2015), refer to Harvard’s Food Law and Policy Clinic’s, University of Arkansas', and Food Recovery Project’s Tax Deduction for Food Donation: a legal guide (refer to the Disclaimer of Endorsement statement above) |
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders in Retail/Food Services: |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumers and Donation
Key Stakeholders
- Individual Consumers or Groups
- Soup Kitchens
- Food Banks
- Schools/Institutions
- Faith-Based Organizations
- Non-profit/Advocacy Organizations
Opportunities Highlighted by Stakeholders
Reduce wasted food by tailoring purchase and preparation practices and providing the public with clear information about the wholesomeness of food as well as the importance of food stewardship.
Opportunities for Individuals:
- Reduce wasted food due to spoilage through behavior change:
- Tailor purchases around meal planning;
- Reduce plate waste by preparing meals according to recommended serving sizes; and
- Conduct frequent pantry and refrigerator checks (i.e., shop your refrigerator first).
- Participate in residential, community or home compost projects where available.
Opportunities for Groups:
- Provide education and outreach for targeted audiences with clear, consistent definitions and messaging.
- Educate households on proper food storage focusing on fresh produce.
- Provide information to clients, customers, and the public about date labeling and food safety as well as tips on recipes and storage to maximize food usage.
- Improve training and training tools for those working and volunteering at donation centers (e.g., food safety, handling and storage, quality of products, applicable guidelines).
- Explore opportunities to recover (animal feed) or recycle (compost, industrial uses) food waste.
Demonstrated Practices
The following links exit the site
Demonstrated Practices for Consumers and Donation |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders
The following links exit the site
For Individuals: | For Groups: |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery/Recycling
Key Stakeholders
- Composters
- Energy Recovery/Anaerobic Digestion
- Industrial Uses
- Transporters
- Animal Feed Operators
Opportunities Highlighted by Stakeholders
Bolster and improve recovery and recycling operations by creating partnerships that reduce business expenses, improve education and outreach, and create new markets.
Opportunities for Recovery Operations:
- For animal feed operations, increase the usage of food waste and food byproducts, as allowable under federal, state and local law.
- Publicize food recovery programs to recognize partnering businesses and organizations.
- Reduce transportation cost by developing co-ops, partnerships or other relationships that reduce or distribute cost among several operations/organizations.
Opportunities for Recycling Operations:
- Develop partnerships and collaborations within the local area to optimize operations and build capacity.
- To maintain the viability of your operation, develop well researched business and operational practices. Make sure to fully account for siting, available technologies, training of staff, potential feedstocks and customers, nuisance issues (e.g., odor), community support, scalability of operations, applicable laws, and other key factors.
- Build and maintain the support of the surrounding community to the operations.
- Develop strategies to control feedstock contamination as well as other common physical (moisture) or chemical issues (pH) typical of composting or digestion operations.
- Create opportunities by developing clear messages on benefits of food recovery and recycling.
Demonstrated Practices
The following links exit the site
Demonstrated Practices for Recovery/Recycling |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actions Suggested by Stakeholders
For Recovery Operations | For Recycling Operations | For Recovery and Recycling Operations |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
Regulators/Policy Makers
Key Stakeholders
- Federal Government
- Local Government
- State Government
- Tribal Government
- Non-governmental Organizations
Opportunities Highlighted by Stakeholders
Promote the reduction of food loss and waste through policies, guidance and other tools that will strengthen communities and reduce the associated environmental, social, and economic impacts.
Federal:
- To get a better understanding of the size and impacts of food loss and waste, help standardize measurement and data analysis tools.
- Foster private and public collaboration to reduce food loss and waste and find new opportunities within local communities and regions.
- To increase food donation and recovery/recycling, provide clarity on laws and regulations related to food safety, food donations, and organic recycling and recovery operations.
- Help to create and deliver effective and consistent messaging to the public about the importance of food stewardship and the need to address food loss and waste.
- Provide grants to help secondary resellers expand to lower-income neighborhoods and eradicate food deserts.
- Create opportunities to recognize leaders in private and public sectors taking action to reduce food loss and waste.
- Convene meetings with stakeholders to improve the state of the food system and help craft new strategies to address food loss and waste.
- Establish clear goals and strategic plans to achieve the 2030 FLW reduction goal.
Stake/Tribal/Local:
- Assist and support private and public collaborations to reduce food loss and waste.
- To increase food donation and recovery/recycling, provide clarity and consistency on regulations related to food safety, food donations, and organics recycling and recovery operations.
- Work with community and local business leaders to develop messaging to the public on the importance of reducing wasted food and the need to address food loss and waste in your jurisdiction.
- Create opportunities to recognize leaders in the private and public sectors taking action to reduce food loss and waste.
- Convene meetings with stakeholders to improve the state of the industry and help craft new strategies to address food loss and waste.
Demonstrated Practices
The following links exit the site
Federal Laws: | Federal Efforts: | Federal Resources and Tools | State, Local, and Tribal Efforts | State, Local, and Tribal Resources and Tools | International Efforts | Non-governmental Organization Tools |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to the State of Massachusetts Economic Impact Analysis for their Commercial Food Waste Ban | ||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Actions as Suggested by Stakeholders
Federal | State, Tribal, and Local |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|