EPA RCRA ID: VAD188141626
On this page:
- Cleanup Status
- Facility Description
- Contaminants at this Facility
- Institutional/Engineer Controls
- Enforcement and Compliance
- Related Information
- Contacts for this Facility
Cleanup Status
Note: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) is the lead agency for managing cleanups at this facility.
Pfizer, through legacy Wyeth, entered EPA's Region 3's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action "Facility Lead Program" in September 2006 to meet RCRA Corrective Action obligations associated with the former operation of a hazardous waste storage area. Previously, the facility was enrolled in the Virginia Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) to address releases of various constituents to groundwater from the Former Plant A and its associated wastewater treatment plant at the facility. Entry into the Facility Lead Program broadened the geographic scope of the release assessment to the entire RCRA Facility. Pfizer sold the facility to Fareva in the Fall of 2011.
On August 24, 2020, EPA issued a public notice that its proposed remedy was presented in a Statement of Basis. No comments were received. On September 30, 2020, EPA selected a Final Remedy that remains unchanged from the proposed remedy presented in the Statement of Basis and consists of the following five components:
1. Monitored natural attenuation until groundwater remedial objectives are met.
2. Compliance with a plan, approved by EPA and/or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ), to manage contaminated soil and groundwater to prevent unacceptable risk within the areas designated by EPA (EPA-designated Areas)
3. Compliance with an EPA and/or VADEQ approved groundwater monitoring program until it is shown that the groundwater remedial objectives have been met and will continue to be met and EPA and/or VADEQ approve in writing the termination of the Groundwater Monitoring Program.
4. Compliance with and maintenance of groundwater and land use restrictions to be implemented through institutional controls.
5. Compliance with notification requirements.
Release, Cleanup, and Investigation Background
In 1992, a release to the ground of flea dip product from a vent pipe on the west wall of the Former Plant A was discovered. Impacted soil was excavated and disposed of off-site in two phases. In April 1993, soil extending approximately eight feet west from the west wall of the former Plant A and three feet deep was excavated. In August 1993, soil extending approximately ten feet by 35 feet along the west wall to a depth of ten to twelve feet was excavated.
Following soil excavation, a 10,000-gallon underground storage tank which formerly contained isopropyl alcohol was removed from the area, and the area was backfilled, leveled, and compacted.
During the early 1990’s, a break in an underground process sewer line at the former Plant A wastewater treatment plant was discovered and repaired.
In the late 1990’s, floor drains in the Plant B former Train Shed were connected to a sewer system. Prior to the connection, floor drains in the shed discharged to the subsurface soil.
In 1998, the main process sewer located north of Plant B and Building 2300 and on a west to east line parallel with Darbytown Road- continuing east to South Laburnum Road -was found to be compromised in proximity to Cornelius Creek. A new sewer line was installed along where the piping was compromised. An abandoned sewer line remains in place.
Approximately in the early 2000’s, a brick lined sump receiving Facility process wastewater directly from the main sewer line overflowed near Cornelius Creek. The sump was removed in 2003 when a new Facility process wastewater treatment plant was installed at the same area.
In 2001, the former Plant A and its accompanying wastewater treatment plant was demolished and removed. In addition, sewers associated with those operations were excavated and removed. During the demolition and removal activities, impacted soils were encountered. Impacted soil near the former Plant A wastewater treatment plant was excavated. Soil samples were collected throughout the demolished Plant A area, including by the flea dip excavation area and by the former wastewater treatment plant area. The soil sample analyses results detected a total of 17 constituents, including three volatile organic compounds (VOCs), three semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), three polyaromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs), and eight pesticides. Except for one pesticide, detected concentrations were less than residential risk-based screening levels (RSLs). For that one pesticide, a screening level does not exist.
An investigation of impact to groundwater was conducted. Initial results detected elevated concentrations of contaminants in groundwater below the area of the former Plant A and its accompanying former wastewater treatment plant. Subsequent investigations were conducted to determine the nature and extent of the groundwater contamination. Overall, twenty-five groundwater monitoring wells were installed from 2001 to 2012. Groundwater samples were periodically collected from subsets of wells through to 2014. Contamination was found in groundwater extending east and southeast of Building 2300 and extending to the southeast property boundary along Darbytown Road. In 2006 and 2007, 14 inorganic constituents were detected in sampled groundwater monitoring wells surrounding Building 2300. Of these, maximum concentrations of nine inorganic constituents exceeded drinking water standards referred to as maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or tap water RSLs and the maximum concentration of one constituent, mercury, exceeded vapor intrusion screening levels. From 2010 to 2014, 80 organic constituents, including 41 VOCs, three SVOCs, 18 PAHs, 13 pesticides, and five tentatively identified compounds (TICs), were detected in sampled groundwater monitoring wells near Building 2300. Of these, maximum concentrations of six VOCs, one SVOC, four PAHs, and seven pesticides exceeded MCLs or tap water RSLs and maximum concentrations of five VOCs exceeded vapor intrusion screening levels. Additionally, at minimum, approximately eight “unknown” VOC TICs and seven “unknown” SVOC TICs were detected in sampled groundwater monitoring wells near Building 2300.
In 2001, an upstream extension to the main sewer line (AOC 4/5) that runs beneath Plant B was determined to be degraded and required replacement. Plant production was halted, the degraded sewer was line was excavated, and visibly impacted soils were excavated and disposed at an off-site facility.
Additionally in 2001, after finding significant breaks, a sewer line extending north from the rear of the Plant B structure was replaced. Abandoned sewer line remains in place.
In 2002, oil was released from a utility building when a gauge broke. Impacted soil was removed to a depth of two to three feet below the ground surface and a temporary sump was installed to collect additional fuel drainage. Soil confirmation samples following the excavation showed that the level of total petroleum hydrocarbons was below 100 parts per million. In March 2004, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) issued a closure letter for the release.
In September 2005, approximately 20 feet of the main process sewer line carrying both sanitary and process water and located north of Plant B and Building 2300 experienced a break. The line was repaired and the ground was treated with lime.
A survey conducted in early 2006 identified further areas of compromised piping. Additionally it was noted that the main process sewer line located north of Plant B and Building 2300 running for 1/3 mile on a west to east line parallel with Darbytown Road experienced a number of breaks and spot repairs over 18 years. As a result, Wyeth installed approximately 2000 linear feet of new sewers. Abandoned sewer line remains in place.
Around the same time period, approximately 160 linear feet of sewer below a mixing room in the southwest corner of Plant B was found to be compromised.
In 2008 and in 2009, investigations were conducted by Pfizer to identify releases at the Facility. The locations which were sampled included sediment in Cornelius Creek, soil and groundwater near where the process waste water sump overflowed by the Creek [Area of Concern (AOC) 1], soil and groundwater near where breaks occurred in a now abandoned portion of the main sewer line that extends from north of Plant B to northeast of Building 2300 (AOC 4/5), groundwater south of the former mixing room in the southwest corner of Plant B, and subsurface soil and groundwater throughout the Laburnum Avenue Farm Field.
In sediment samples collected from eleven locations in Cornelius Creek, 23 constituents, including three VOCs, 10 PAHs, and 10 pesticides were detected. For human exposures, except for one PAH, detected concentrations were less than residential RSLs. For one PAH, benzo(a)pyrene, the maximum detected concentration exceeded its residential RSL but was less than its industrial RSL. For ecological exposure, maximum detected concentrations of one VOC and six (6) PAHs exceeded ecological screening levels and for two VOCs, a screening level did not exist. For all nine constituents, maximum detected concentrations were less than baseline levels of potential ecological concern, which applied an expanded set of screening values, and therefore, it was found that exposures of sediment at Cornelius Creek were unlikely to result in adverse impacts to ecological receptors.
At an area near the process wastewater sump overflow (AOC 1), 45 constituents, including seven VOCs, two SVOCs, 18 PAHs, and 18 pesticides were detected in soil. Except for three PAHs, detected concentrations were less than residential RSLs. For three PAHs, maximum detected concentrations exceeded residential RSLs but were less than industrial RSLs. A risk assessment found exposure risk at the sampled soil area is acceptable for residents, site workers, construction workers, utility workers and adolescent trespassers.
At sampled locations near sewer line breaks (AOC 4/5) along a now abandoned sewer line, nine constituents including two VOCs, one SVOC, and six pesticides, were detected in soil. All detected concentrations were less than residential RSLs.
At four groundwater monitoring wells installed south of the southwest corner of Plant B, 35 constituents, including 14 VOCs, four SVOCs, four PAHs, eleven pesticides, and two TICs were detected in groundwater. Of these, maximum concentrations of one VOC, two SVOCs, one PAH, and four pesticides exceeded MCLs or tap water RSLs and the maximum concentration of one VOC exceeded its vapor intrusion screening level. Methylene blue active substances and diesel and gasoline range organics also were detected. Additionally, at minimum, approximately one “unknown” VOC TIC, and four “unknown” SVOC TICs were detected.
In ten groundwater monitoring wells installed at the former Laburnum Farm Field east of Cornelius Creek, a total of eight organic constituents, including one VOC, four SVOCs and three pesticides, were detected. Of these, the maximum concentration of one pesticide, heptachlor, exceeded its tap water RSL but was less than its MCL.
In 2010, a sub-slab vapor investigation was conducted below Building 2300 when the building was operating under positive pressure. A total of 37 constituents, including 21 VOCs, one SVOC, and 15 TICs were detected. The detected concentrations of the 21 VOCs and one SVOC were less than residential vapor intrusion screening levels for soil gas. Of the 15 TICs, six were classified as “unknown”. The results indicate exposure risk to Site workers inside Building 2300 is negligible when it is operated under positive pressure.
In 2012, surface soil samples were collected at the Laburnum Avenue Farm Field. At sampled surface soil and subsurface soil locations in Laburnum Avenue Farm Field in 2008 and 2012, 36 constituents, including five VOCs, three SVOCs, 11 PAHs, and 17 pesticides, were detected. All detected concentrations were less than residential RSLs.
In early 2014, Pfizer notified EPA of the potential for past release to the environment at additional areas, including the potential for release associated with former forklift maintenance operations which were performed at the Building 2300 Rail Spur Loading Dock until the early 2000’s.
In 2016, surface soil along the inactive rail spur and the Building 2300 Rail Spur Loading Dock was sampled and analyzed for PCBs. No PCBs were detected.
In April 2016, EPA determined that contamination in groundwater and human exposures risk from contaminants were under control.
Cleanup Actions or environmental indicators characterizing the entire facility are shown below. It is not intended as an extensive list of milestones/activities. This listing, and all the data on this page, come from EPA’s RCRAInfo and are refreshed nightly to this page. For this table and the Cleanup Activities Pertaining to a Portion of the Facility table that follows, a blank in the Status column could mean the action either has not occurred or has not been reported in RCRAInfo.
Cleanup Activities Pertaining to the Entire Facility
Action | Status | Date of Action |
---|---|---|
Human Exposure Under Control Human Exposure Under Control(CA725) | ||
Groundwater Migration Under ControlGroundwater Migration Under Control (CA750) | ||
Remedy DecisionRemedy Decision (CA400) | ||
Remedy ConstructionRemedy Construction (CA550) | ||
Ready for Anticipated Use Ready for Anticipated Use (CA800) | ||
Performance Standards AttainedPerformance Standards Attained (CA900) | ||
Corrective Action Process TerminatedCorrective Action Process Terminated (CA999) |
For definitions of the terms used, hover over or click on the term.
Cleanup Activities Pertaining to a Portion of the Facility
Action | Area Name | Date of Action |
---|
For definitions of the terms used, hover over or click on the term.
Facility Description
Link to a larger, interactive view of the map.
The facility property is approximately 300 acres and is located southeast of Richmond. Two primary buildings currently are located at the facility: Plant B was constructed in 1980 and is a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant. Building 2300 was constructed in the 1970’s and an addition was added in 1999. Uses of Building 2300 include former use as a distribution center. Building 2300 now is used to manufacture aerosols. One or more analytical laboratories have operated at both Plant B and Building 2300. Past industrial operations at the property include the manufacture of pet pesticide products (flea collars, etc.) and over-the-counter medicinal products (as well as a quality control/quality assurance laboratory) at the Former Plant A, which was constructed in 1975 and demolished in 2001. The former Plant A and its accompanying wastewater treatment plant were located to the north and rear of Building 2300. An inactive farm is located on Facility property east of Cornelius Creek and west of Laburnum Avenue. The surrounding area includes properties zoned for residential, industrial, and agricultural use. Residences, including a new residential development, exist along the south side Darbytown Road, immediately south of the Site. The Facility is a large quantity generator of hazardous waste.
Contaminants at this Facility
Chloroform is the most widespread contaminant detected in the shallow groundwater below the Site. Additional contaminants of concern include 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and trichloroethylene (TCE). Existing data indicate additional data is needed to demonstrate concentrations of these contaminants in the shallow groundwater below the site are acceptable for drinking water and/or tap water exposure. There is no current or projected use of the groundwater for drinking water at the site.
Institutional and Engineering Controls at this Facility
The final remedy includes institutional controls that restrict land and groundwater use and require groundwater monitoring.
Institutional and Engineering Controls help ensure human exposure and groundwater migration are under control at a cleanup facility. Where control types have been reported by states and EPA in EPA’s RCRAInfo, they are shown below. Not all control types are needed at all facilities, and some facilities do not require any controls. Where there are blanks, the control types may not be needed, may not be in place, or may not be reported in RCRAInfo.
Are Controls in Place at this Facility?
Control(s) Type |
Control(s) in Place? |
Areas Subject to Control(s) |
Documents available on-line: |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Institutional ControlsNon-engineering controls used to restrict land use or land access in order to protect people and the environment from exposure to hazardous substances remaining in the site/or facility. (CA 772) |
Informational DevicesInformational Devices (ID) |
|||
Governmental Controls (GC) |
||||
Enforcement and Permit Tools (EP) |
||||
Proprietary ControlsProprietary Controls (PR) | ||||
Engineering ControlsEngineering measures designed to minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination by either limiting direct contact with contaminated areas or controlling migration of contaminants. (CA 770) |
Groundwater ControlGroundwater Control (GW) |
|||
Non-Groundwater |
For definitions of the terms used, hover over or click on the term.
Enforcement and Compliance at this Facility
EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) provides detailed historical information about enforcement and compliance activities at each RCRA Corrective Action Site in their Enforcement and Compliance Historical Online (ECHO) system.
RCRA Enforcement and Compliance Reports from ECHO
Related Information
For more information about this facility, see these other EPA links:
- RCRA information in EPA’s Envirofacts database
- Information about this facility submitted to EPA under different environmental programs as reported in EPA’s Facility Registry Services
- Alternative Names for this facility as reported by EPA programs in EPA’s Facility Registry Services
- Cleanups in My Community provides an interactive map to see EPA cleanups in context with additional data, and lists for downloading data
- Search RCRA Corrective Action Sites provides a search feature for Corrective Action Sites
Documents, Photos and Graphics
Contacts for this Facility
EPA Region implements and enforces the RCRA Corrective Action program for and federally recognized tribes.
For further information on this corrective action site, use the Contact Information for Corrective Action Hazardous Waste Clean Ups listings that are accessible through Corrective Action Programs around the Nation.