All News Releases By Date

EPA Releases Most Recent Information on Toxic Releases into New York's Environment

Release Date: 04/11/2001
Contact Information:

(#01030) New York, N.Y. - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released the most recent data available about the amount of toxic chemicals released into environment of New York State by industrial and other facilities. Since 1988, the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) has been released to the public by EPA every year to help Americans know more about the chemicals present in their local environment and track environmental trends over time. The data made available today are for releases that took place in 1999. Toxic releases in New York State of the over 600 chemicals and chemical categories currently tracked by TRI from a number of industries (including industries tracked for the first time in 1998), were down from approximately 68.65 million pounds in 1998 to 61.86 million pounds in 1999. Of the 700 facilities in New York State reporting toxic releases in 1999, the ten facilities with most releases into the local environment are as follows (in descending order): 1. ZCA Mines in Gouverneur, St. Lawrence County 2. Chemical Waste Management Chemical Services L.L.C. in Model City, Niagara County 3. Eastman Kodak Company in Rochester, Monroe County 4. Finch Pruyn & Co. in Glens Falls, Warren County 5. Southern Energy - Lovett Generating Station in Tompkins Cove, Rockland County 6. NRG Dunkirk Steam Station in Dunkirk, Chautauqua County 7. C.R. Huntley Steam Station in Tonawanda, Erie County 8. Anheuser-Busch Inc. in Baldwinsville, Onondaga County 9. Russel Station in Rochester, Monroe County 10. Samuel Carlson Generating Station in Jamestown, Chautauqua County Note: Attached please find EPA’s national press release on the 1999 TRI data release. --------------- FOR RELEASE: April 11, 2001 EPA ISSUES NEW TOXICS REPORT, IMPROVES MEANS OF REPORTING Luke C. Hester 202-564-7818 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today released its annual report on the amount of toxic releases discharged by facilities throughout the country. The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for 1999, the year of the most recent data, shows continued good news with decreases in emissions in several industries. The Agency also announced steps being taken to make it easier for industry to meet reporting requirements. "This inventory is a powerful tool for helping to protect public health and the environment. I am pleased at the significant progress being made as trends continue downward. We continue to have high quality information to analyze and provide to citizens," said EPA Administrator Christie Whitman. "Americans are reaping considerable benefits from the TRI program. We’re seeing constant decreases of emissions to air, land and water, especially in the manufacturing industries where there has been a 46 percent decrease over the 12-year history of the program." To facilitate industry reporting requirements, EPA has introduced a new computer software product, "TRIAL", which provides reporting facilities easier access to all TRI reporting regulations and guidance on interpreting those regulations. This system is available on EPA’s TRI website and is included in the software package provided to companies for the reporting process required by Congress under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA). The EPCRA law requires industrial facilities each year to publicly report the quantities of toxic chemicals released into the air, water and land. EPA analyzes the submitted data. Overall, the TRI includes information on releases and other wastes for 644 toxic chemicals and chemical compounds. There has been a chemical emissions decrease of 46 percent in the manufacturing industries, about 1.5 billion pounds over the 12-year history of the program. The one-year decrease from 1998 to 1999 was 2.5 percent. TRI data include chemicals released as waste into the air, water or land, and other types of waste management, such as the chemicals that are recycled, burned for energy recovery or treated, both on-site and off-site. Looking at all types of wastes, the total quantity increased by five percent or almost one billion pounds since facilities began reporting other waste management data in 1991. The one-year increase from 1998 to 1999 was 323 million pounds or 1.4 percent. Of those industries which began making TRI reports beginning for 1998 emissions, coal mining facilities reported a 9.7 percent decrease in releases from 1998 to 1999 and petroleum terminals and bulk storage facilities a 5.5 percent decrease in releases. The largest increase in total releases from 1998 to 1999 was reported by metal mining—an increase of 416.3 million pounds or 11.7 percent. For chemical wholesale distributors, total releases from 1998 to 1999 increased by 28.3 percent (435,000 pounds), waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities by 2.7 percent (7.5 million pounds) and electric generating facilities by 2.2 percent (24.9 million pounds). The largest volume of chemical releases for all industries was reported by facilities in Nevada, followed by Utah, Arizona, Alaska, Texas, Ohio, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Indiana and Illinois, in that order. The TRI program, adhering to the EPCRA law, began by covering the manufacturing industry and subsequently adding other industries. TRI annual reports reflect releases and other waste management activities of chemicals, not exposures of the public to those chemicals. The release estimates alone are not sufficient to determine exposure or to calculate potential adverse effects on human health and the environment. The determination of potential risk depends upon many factors, including toxicity, chemical fate after release, release location, and population concentrations. The 1999 Toxics Release Inventory data and background information on the TRI program are available at: https://www.epa.gov/tri  A special research tool, TRI EXPLORER, is available on a link from the web page. It provides county-by-county assessments of the data. The public also can sort the data by facility, chemical, geographic areas or industry, and at the state or national level. The availability of these data make it possible to gauge a facility’s progress in reducing toxic chemical pollution.